Sacramento Kings Talk

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Are the Kings better without Webber?
WebberFan

Date:
Are the Kings better without Webber?


The reason I ask is because they won so many games without him. What do you guys think?

__________________
SHAQ sucks

Date:

No way! In my opinion. The Kings HAVE to have Webber to take it to the next level. Which WILL be an NBA Championship.

__________________
HeySlick

Date:

Unfortunately, the King's will not advance. The team has catered to Chris Webber, he hasn't produced for the team prior to his major injury last year. His injury now affects the flow of the game, and the morale of the team in general. I don't feel the King's will ever advance until Webber is traded, or his contract is bought out. He's a deficit, not a plus for the team...(get rid of Webber, and the team will begin winning again)

ps..To all who continue on with this mindset, oh when Webber gets in shape, oh when Webber this, oh when Webber that. are losers just like Webber is...PERIOD!!

__________________
KINGSxxFAN

Date:

BASKETBALL IS A TEAMWORK. MAYBE THE KINGS DID LOSE MORE WHEN WEBBER WAS BACK.. BUT THAT`S NOT HIS FAULT. IT`S THE WHOLE TEAM`S. NO, NOT BECAUSE THEY SIGNED WEBBER OR LET HIM PLAY!  BUT BECAUSE FOR THE SHOT HE MISSED, SOMEONE SHOULD HAVE REBOUND.ED IT OR DO SOEMTHING.

MY OPINION .. WEBBER F`SHO IS NEEDED AND SHOULDNT BE ANY LESS LOVED THAN BEFORE!



__________________
KingsFreak

Date:

I totally agree with you. It has been the whole team that has stunk it up in the past month. Is it Webber's fault that other teams just go in for layups? NO! it's the WHOLE team. We love ya C-WEBB!!!......

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard